Thursday, June 3, 2010

Impact of Distress on Class A Office Valuations

We saw a question posted on a commercial real estate web site inquiring about pricing differences and impacts that Distressed Real Estate is having on valuing Class A Properties. Here is the exact question that was posted on Loopnet. "How are brokers valuing class A properties with so many distressed properties thrown into the mix?"

Here are our thoughts:



The performing "Class A Market" is different than and priced differently than the "Distressed Market".

Recommending a value or proposed sales price takes a disciplined approach, comparing market trends and market demand. Our job as investment brokers is to be able to thoroughly evaluate the property-- including recent comparable sales, an evaluation of income and expenses to determine net operating income, replacement cost, and competitive positioning within the market. In addition understanding the motivations of the Seller, macro conditions in the marketplace, and financing costs and availability, also need thorough consideration today.
In our opinion, there are two distinct and different markets today. Class A properties, those that are stabilized with good tenants and good income, are scarce and are trading at surprisingly low cap rates. Distressed properties -- with income that won't support the debt service, or properties that are unfinished, or poorly performing, in areas with little demand, are being sought by a different category of Buyer. (The property with a "story" that was built or bought at the top of the market.) Distressed vs. Class A Institutional are really different markets and should be and are priced differently.

Class A doesn't just mean "expensive finishes" it means strong demand. In the current market environment, the best income-producing properties—those distinguished by superior quality of construction and the right location are likely to hold their value, keep their tenants and appreciate sooner and more than others. Early in this recession, pricing correction affected all properties, including those with the strongest operating performance and, in the case of new developments, the potential for such performance. But now it is back to fundamental evaluation and underwriting. Location, rent roll analysis, expense benchmarking, strong management and the like makes a real difference.

The relative attractiveness of good buildings to tenants and investors should allow them to stay ahead of the rest even in the challenging years ahead; their values have hopefully bottomed out as the broader market continues to find the bottom. Anecdotal evidence suggests that cap rates on scarce Class A properties with real income and good lease terms are therefore much sought-after assets attracting multiple offers and those cap rates have already come down.

The current cap rate decline starts with that fact that there is more capital (debt and equity) in the market than there is product. That factor alone has pushed values up and cap rates down-- but only for strong assets. Distress Buyers and Distress Prices are different than most well performing Class A properties. Distressed deals get picked over and trade at dramatic discounts to replacement costs; if they trade at all. For many of these deals the owner has no equity and getting quality information and timely decision making is very problematic.
Institutional investors are seeking quality NOI. We are reading reports and hearing about deals in northern California where pricing with cap rates as low as 6+% based for good assets. But if it isn't class A -- and if the lease terms are short and there is any scent of distress or credit quality risk -- or if the likelihood of vacancy and rent-up risk is high --then the cap rate is more like 9% -- and or price per square foot-- well below replacement. That said, there is a great deal of anxiety out there as to how far cap rates have fallen and does it make a risk adjusted sense for them to stay low? The current imbalance of available high quality class A properties and the amount of capital seeking to invest in them has created what a number of analysts and market participants call a "scarcity premium." We believe that the distressed properties that are coming to market are those with little hope of value recovery for the foreseeable future (more than three years). These are two distinct markets -- priced differently for different categories of buyers.

If you have a question that is more specific to a particular property or market - or if we can help you assess the value of your asset -- Class A or Distressed -- or something in between, feel free to contact us. We promise you professional and friendly service. jgray@ctbt.com or nanvary@ctbt.com

No comments: